Tateh's Transformation from Radical Socialist to Typical Capitalist



Tateh's Transformation from Radical Socialist to Typical Capitalist



    One of the most interesting characters in E.L Doctrow’s Ragtime (in my opinion) is Tateh. This is a character that embodies the struggles of the immigrant experience during the 20th century in America, and later a success story of the American Dream. As we are first introduced to Tateh, he is found working on the street. He works day and night tirelessly as an artist to support his daughter, “His hair has turned white in the last month. He is thirty-two years old.” (Doctorow 43).

    At first, Tateh takes pride in doing hard work: he refuses to take handouts from Evelyn, instead insisting on only being paid for his work, and drawing her portrait. In this way, Tateh embodies his perceptions of hard work and ultimately his socialist values. His role as president of Socialist Artists’ Alliance underscores his commitment to hard work and struggle. At this stage in the book, Tateh’s worldview is defined by moral rigidity, and faith in socialism as a means of confronting exploitation.

    A major cause of Tateh’s shift in moral perspective is not just his own ambitions, but his devotion to his daughter. From the beginning, he works from hours on end to keep her alive, but he can’t bear the thought of her growing up in poverty. After the union won the strike, but only won a few extra cents per hour, “Tateh began to conceive of his life as separate from the fate of the working class.” (Doctorow 131). When he sees the limited and oppressive success of the factory work, Tateh’s belief in socialism starts to waver, and Tateh begins to envision a better future for himself and his daughter: However, not solidarity and socialism, but through personal reinvention and entrepreneurial ambition.

    Tateh’s invention of the moving picture books is what eventually accelerates his departure from socialism and his embrace of capitalism. And indeed, what leads to this event is also his daughter: what begins as an act of love, creating stories for his daughter, becomes the seed of his eventual success. By capitalising on this idea, Tateh leaves behind the streets where he used to work and reinvents himself as Baron Ashkenazzy. After selling his first moving picture book: “Come, Tateh said to his child, we’ll find a boardinghouse in a good neighborhood and then we’ll have ourselves a meal and a hot bath” (Doctorow 133). By doing this, the one radical Tateh abandons his association with his past and the exploited working class just to embrace the capitalist system he once denounced.

    Alongside his political and economic transformation, Tateh undergoes a personal and moral shift. At the beginning of Ragtime, Tateh has very rigid morals: he banishes his wife after her exploitation by her boss and abandons Nesbit after finding out her true identity. However, at the end of the story, Tateh even marries Mother just a year after Father’s death. By doing this, he provides the girl with a mother figure, having her grow up safe, healthy, and far removed from the long ago suffering of immigrant poverty. His marriage to Mother shows a change in Tateh’s morals: much looser and more willing to conform to his new capitalist life. The socialist radical who once saw the wealthy as enemies married into a family that embodies capitalism.







Works Cited:


Doctorow, E. L. Ragtime. Random House, 2007.

Comments

  1. Wow Jason! I really like your avant garde style of organizing your website. I think its interesting that you say that Tateh marrying mother is going against his ideals. While I agree that he is pretty conservative, I think that him marrying mother actually is a statement about his conservativeness rather than a rejection. Mother is commonly described as the epitome of wifery - feminine, demanding when needed and beautiful. I think by marrying him, he is reaffirming his values (especially since now, they have the traditional "atomic" family).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good job Jason. I found it interesting how you connected the dots of Tateh's journey of ideals. from initially being socialist and the transition to capitalist success, and how his daughter played a role. I like how you have established this as kind of a "hero's journey" and it feels like this part of the story where post-modernism aligns with societies views from the time Doctorow wrote the book.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm not sure I'd describe Tateh as a "typical capitalist," in that he is getting in on a brand-new modern industry at the start, and his entree into this industry is a result of his own creativity and innovation. He's maybe in the subcategory "artist-capitalist"? I don't know. But I agree that his story arc is generally a positive and even inspirational one, and it does happen to follow the model of the Horatio Alger "American Dream" stories. You mention his strict Old World morals and the sad fate of his first wife near the end, and this is the part of Tateh's story that sits most uneasily with me: she gets kicked out of her home *for being sexually assaulted by her boss*, which is appalling, and later he tells Mother that his wife has died. We have no reason to believe that he knows anything about her fate one way or the other--she is simply "dead to him," and he seems to be mainly assuring her that it's fine if they now marry. In a story that is generally quite warm and positive and "successful," the fate of Tateh's first wife always sticks with me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like how you structured Tateh's transformation around his relationship with his daughter. What I find interesting is that while you can categorize capitalism as a more "selfish" economic system, Tateh transitions to capitalism in order to support his child. I think there's an interesting analysis that could be done on intrafamilial "selflessness" in the place of overall societal "selfishness."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Jason! Great work. I feel like Tateh's transformation indeed reflects a shift in his values: whereas he prioritized his socialist cause at the beginning of the book, the unions and strikes caused him to prioritize the well-being of his daughter, even at the cost of abandonment of his prior socialism. An interesting point is how he makes propaganda films at Hollywood towards the end of the book, which may really indicate that Tateh has completely joined the capitalists. Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Jason, I thought this post was really interesting! It made me think about how Tateh was kind of in a dilemma where he had to choose whether to continue to uphold his socialist values, or submit to capitalism in order to provide for his daughter. I think he made the right decision overall, to look out for his daughter first, but I still don't know if I would call him a 'typical capitalist' after this evolution. I think I remember in chapter 40, when talking to mother, he still calls himself a socialist. Even though his lifestyle has clearly diverged from his roots as a socialist activist, I think it says something that he still associates himself with the movement. I enjoyed reading this, Jason!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment